Juniper and Dell align to target enterprises

Juniper Networks and Dell have signed a deal that will see the pair collaborate to offer combined networking solutions.

Under the agreement, networking products from Juniper will be offered under Dell’s PowerConnect brand. The pair state that this move will allow customers to deploy a common network management platform and network operating system to help them reduce operating expenses.

The deal also includes plans to work together on open, standards-based solutions for virtualised data centres and to create technology solutions using Converged Enhanced Ethernet (CEE). This is intended to improve network economics.

“Networking is an important piece in providing customers with choices for how they optimise their data center operations to improve efficiency,” said Brad Anderson, senior vice president of the Enterprise Product Group at Dell.

“This agreement will help address many of our customer’s biggest challenges including a dramatic rise in security concerns, an increasingly dispersed workforce and challenges brought on with the advent of the virtualised data centre,” added Anderson.

From Juniper’s perspective, the partnership with hardware vendor Dell underlines its strategic concentration on the enterprise networking market.

This OEM agreement is another great step in our sustained and successful push into the enterprise market,” said Gerri Elliott, executive vice president, strategic alliances at Juniper Networks.

“We have the only infrastructure that includes integrated security, routing and switching running on a single operating system. And that uniform approach is a great benefit to IT organisations, from the smallest to the largest, as they tackle the challenges of an increasingly decentralised landscape,” added Elliot.

SolutionBase: Fortinet firewalls provide more bang for the buck than Cisco PIX

My company is planning a project to migrate from a traditional frame-relay network to a site-to-site VPN. As part of this project, we must decide on what firewall and VPN devices we will standardize on.

Currently, we have two remote site-to-site VPN test locations utilizing Cisco PIX 501 firewalls. These locations are connecting back to a Cisco IOS firewall and working successfully. Having configured the PIX firewalls myself, one of my concerns was the complexity of the configuration and troubleshooting. Once we standardize on a device and roll out the VPN network with these associated firewall/VPN devices, I’ll turn this project over to the network administrator and the network support group.

I’d like the end solution to be as simple as possible to troubleshoot, monitor, and modify. While I like Cisco products and I like the idea of standardizing on a Cisco solution, I don’t consider the PIX firewalls to be easy to configure, troubleshoot, or monitor. Sure, Cisco PIX devices do offer the PIX Device Manager (PDM), a Java Web-based interface for management. However, I still feel that, even with the Web-based interface, the PIX still lacks a great deal of user-friendliness and simplicity. Again, while I like Cisco products, in my capacity as project manager, I don’t want to have to say, “Here is the excellent solution I came up with, but yes, it is a pain to do many of the day-to-day tasks.” I was curious if I could find a solution that does the job, but which the network support group would find easy to work with.

Enter Fortinet
I met with a security consulting firm and, after hearing my requirements, they recommended that I take a look at devices from Fortinet, a company that I had never heard of. The consulting firm told me that, yes, there are a large number of choices available in the VPN/firewall market; however, based on the devices they have looked at, they felt that selecting Fortinet offered “the most bang for the buck” in my case.

Some of you reading this may already be very familiar with Fortinet. For those who aren’t, here’s a little background on the company. Ken Xie, the former founder and CEO of Netscreen, founded Fortinet in 2000. I heard that he left Netscreen because he believed strongly in the use of ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits) to run devices like firewalls. At the time, Netscreen disagreed and Xie left to form Fortinet. Today, Fortinet’s Web site says that it is “the only provider of ASIC-powered, network-based antivirus firewalls.”

This idea of using ASICs is interesting. I’m not a firewall architecture expert, but this is what I gathered from my research: Cisco devices use a standard RISC or AMD processor (just like you could find in a small UNIX server), RAM, and operating systems with applications. By using ASICs, Fortinet has dedicated chips that speed the processing of things like firewall filtering, encryption, virus scanning, and traffic shaping. By using these dedicated chips, Fortinet claims that they are the only provider that can screen traffic for viruses at “broadband rates.” In other words, other firewall solutions that scan for viruses have higher latency than the Fortinet solutions, according to Fortinet.

Laptop Computers

You would be very hard pressed to find someone who has never heard of a laptop. As you may already know a laptop is nothing more then a small, portable type of personal computer. They usually have the same capabilities as the larger desktop PC with a few minor differences. Power used to run one of the laptops is generally created by a rechargeable battery which is built into your laptop.

The initial concept dates back to the early 70s when Alan Kay proposed what was known as the Dynabook concept. This was a very early idea for the current laptop. Later this very concept was further developed by Xerox but the resultant computers were not available to the public at that time. The first commercially available laptop appeared in 1980. To those who may be able to think back that far, try and remember the portable machine know as the Osborne 1. This version of a laptop was distributed by the Osborne Computer Corporation and it was extremely heavy and bulky. It has a miniature 5 inch monitor built in which actually was based upon a television set.

After the Osborne appeared a number of companies entered the portable computer field including Compaq, Kaypro and Epson. It wasn’t until the 90’s that the battery powered laptop came into its own right. At the close of the 90’s technology had brought about many different improvements to the laptop computer.

A visit today to one of your local computer stores will reveal a vast selection of laptops with an assortment of looks, various hard drive options, diverse operating systems and different installed applications. You will quickly note that many of the major electronic equipment companies have their versions of the laptop readily available for purchase on the shelves as well. You will see names such as Sony, Dell, Toshiba, Apple, Compaq as well as some of the lesser known business names. The looks of the laptops can vary greatly in their size, the color selections, different screen sizes and various weights.

You are now able to select a laptop computer with numerous RAM capacities, hard drives that are of various speeds and sizes, CD/DVD drives, ready to run network capabilities, various sound quality or graphic capabilities. Each computer manufacturer has certain traits that make their machines desirable. As an example the Apple computer is known far and wide for their great abilities to create and edit images, videos and sounds while the Dell computers are known predominantly for their various customization options as well as their economical price.

Generally laptops will include all of the same capabilities as would be found within desktop computers. They usually are equipped with a standard operating system, various software programs and a graphics card. The major difference in the laptop is the mouse setup. The mouse on a laptop is built into the keyboard whereas the mouse on the normal PC is a separate entity. Generally, if you are averse to using the built in mouse the laptops come with a USB port where you can plug in a normal mouse for use.

Intel vs AMD

When asked what the major processors are in America today one would likely state either Intel or AMD. Both processor companies comprise nearly 90 plus percent of the current market in the United States today. It is the intention of this article to actually attempt to compare the popular Intel processors with those of AMD. Since Intel has continually provided the industry lead for a processor with very general first-class overall performance it stands to reason that AMDAMD on the other hand has continually demonstrated its intentions towards maintaining a very competitive price to performance ratio which could potentially bring them in a vast sum of the processor market. In order to accomplish this amazing take control feat the AMD processors will need to competitively beat each of Intel’s competitions during a technical showdown. will clearly has their job cut out for them.
Although Intel has in the past generously offered a few lower priced options such as Core 2 Duo E4300 or the Celeron processor most of their offerings are of the nominal price range. Their philosophy is generally to concentrate upon the speed and power other then price. In contrast the AMD lineup continues to offer their best selling array of capable Athlon 64 X2’s ranging from models 3600+ all the way to the models 6000+. In addition, as part of their marketing process, AMD has been known to often sell multiple products under one performance based model number. Some of the processors features may actually vary slightly according to the particular model. These variations could be in the area of the clock frequency, the cache size or the memory/socket type.

As in the past AMD will more then likely continue to traditionally provide a fairly direct response in relationship to both cost and performance for most of the Core 2 members range. Usually one will note that the most effected differences usually appear at the high end where one finds the Athlon 64’s performance starts to take its toll. Keep in mind that the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ usually you will discover that these units sell at a substantial discount as opposed to the Core 2 Duo E6700.

AMD has been known to provide an occasional “best deal” offer on a randomly selected processor which would normally sell for a considerable more costly price tag in an effort to slice a bit off of Intel’s healthy profit levels. This is likely an intentional management practice and represents a major facet of AMD’s modern marketing strategy. The practice as found tends to toss out the window any beneficial actions being performed if one was to try and do a price versus performance based comparison.

Juniper unveils new brand

Juniper Networks has announced a major set of new solutions and partnerships which it says will “reinvent the experience and economics of networking”.

The new releases include new processors, new Junos software, new solutions for cloud networking and security, and strategic partnerships

Kevin Johnson, CEO of Juniper said: “Networks are now clearly the hub of business and community around the world, and that’s driving massive scale requirements for the next decade. Driven by our mission to connect everything and empower everyone, Juniper believes it’s time for a new approach to networking. An approach based on smart systems and open software platforms. An approach that adapts to changing business dynamics. An approach that embraces partnership and unleashes innovation.”

The new Junos software platform has been created to allow customers to directly program multiple layers of their networks. The platform includes the Junos network operating system, and the new Junos Space network application platform and Junos Pulse integrated network client.

In the processor field, Juniper announced a new Junos One family of processors, including the Junos Trio chipset with 3D Scaling technology that enables networks to dynamically support more subscribers, services and bandwidth. The Junos Trio will be delivered in new modular line cards and new 3.5-inch routers for Juniper MX Series, which the company says will provide up to 2.6 terabits per second of throughput, making them up to four times faster than the competition, while only using half as much power per gigabit.